Hardly a day goes by when one does not come across an article or op-ed in Hinduphobic mainstream and digital media outlets claiming that minorities (read Muslims) are being lynched with impunity in Bharat over beef, love jihad and what not. But like everything else in the bizarre, alternate universe that our Hinduphobic, Nehruvian elite inhabit, this narrative is far from true.
The reality is that not a single minority has been lynched to death for what is termed as ‘love jihad’ i.e. the grooming of mostly minor non-Muslim girls for sex and/or conversion. Yes, such cases do cause outrage in society (as they should), but the affected families mostly approach police to get justice. As we have seen time after time, police apathy in such cases is the norm, and it is only due to persistent efforts of certain activists and intervention of the rare govt. servant like NCPCR Chariman Priyank Kanoongo that a few minor girls were recovered from living hells.
But Lutyens’ elites do not care for Hindus, minor or adult, rich or poor. What they have also successfully managed to bury due to their hold over the national narrative is that Hindu men run a far greater risk of ending up dead if they enter into a consensual relation with a Muslim girl. Two recent cases demonstrate this ugly social reality –
1.) Kudur, Karnataka – “Man offers to discuss marriage with daughter’s lover, kills him” Times of India, 8 Oct:
“An inter-faith love story ended on a tragic note with the girl’s father and his associates allegedly murdering her 24-year-old boyfriend in Kudur, Magadi taluk, Ramanagara district on Tuesday morning.
K Lakshmipathi, a resident of Basavanahalli near Nelamangala, was allegedly strangled to death by Nizamuddin, 45, and his elder son Sikandar, 20, (goods auto drivers) who have been arrested, and their associates, Ibrat and Auto Mohammed, who are on the run. All the accused are residents of Islampura near Basavanahalli. Lakshmipathi, a garment factory employee and part-time auto driver, was killed in front of his brother.
Probe revealed Lakshmipathi was in love with Nizamuddin’s younger daughter and both the families were against the relationship. “The two eloped last month to tie the knot but returned after Nizamuddin convinced his daughter saying he would get them married. On Tuesday morning, Nizamuddin and the three others took Lakshmipathi and his elder brother Nataraj to a deserted spot in Kanakenahallilaya, a village near Kudur, on the pretext of marriage talks where they strangled Lakshmipathi to death,” said superintendent of police, Ramanagara, S Girish.
K Nataraj, elder brother of Lakshmipathi, claimed in his complaint that the accused mercilessly strangled his brother as he watched helplessly….
“We travelled in Nizamuddin’s auto and reached Kanakenahallilaya. He took us to a prayer hall and then to the foot of a rocky mountain. He made us drink alcohol. A little later, they started abusing Lakshmipathi, citing religious differences and told him he shouldn’t even dream of marrying the girl. When he resisted, the four started beating him up. They pulled out his belt and as I watched, Sikandar and Ibrat strangled my brother to death. They threatened to kill me too…” Nataraj, a daily-wage worker, said in the complaint.”
2.) New Delhi – “Teen tutor beaten to death over relationship with girl in Delhi” Times of India, 10 Oct:
“An 18-year old tutor was thrashed to death by a group of youths in northwest Delhi’s Adarsh Nagar on Wednesday night. Prima facie the cause of the altercation was the teen’s relationship with the girl which her family found untenable.
On Wednesday evening, some of the girl’s relatives met the boy and set upon him with sticks and rods. When he fell unconscious, he was taken to hospital, where he succumbed to injuries. The hospital informed police about the case.
Preliminary investigations revealed that the teenager, Rahul Rajput, was friendly with a girl in the neighbourhood against the wishes of her family members. Police said the group that attacked the boy included the brother of the girl, Mohammad Raj, 20, a relative Manwar Hussain, 20, and three of their friends, who are minors. The five have been apprehended for the murder.
According to the cops, Rajput was pursuing his studies from National Institute of Open Schooling while also tutoring children of the area in English.
Recalling the incident, the father, Sanjay Rajput, said his son had been called by the group in the evening, who pretended to be enquiring about the English tuition classes. “The boys then hustled him to another lane and started thrashing him. The locals informed us and we rushed to help Rahul. There were at least seven men beating him,” said the father.
“Around a month ago, the girl had called Rahul on the mobile phone and my wife had warned her not to call again. Both of them were studying at an NGO earlier and must have become friends then…
Sanjay Rajput said his son had a fever and wanted to get himself tested for Covid. The girl had accompanied him for the testing, which proved negative. “Even if the girl’s family had an issue, my son was young and they could have slapped him or told us. But killing him could not have been the solution,” said the distraught father.
“All I want is that the people who killed my son should never be released from jail. They have ruined my family and taken away my son. I don’t have anyone now to lose, but there are others like my son who shouldn’t suffer.”
The family of the girl lives a few lanes away from the Rajputs. Sources claimed that the girl helped the cops identify the accused.”
Fresh reports have revealed that the girl was present when Rahul was being lynched and pleaded with her relatives to stop.
Now, this is real intolerance. And this, mind you, are the actions of people from a minority community that is supposedly ‘scared out of their wits’, if Lutyens chatteratti are to be believed! The boy’s father, an ‘upper caste’ member of the ‘blood-thirsty’ Hindu majority in the capital of a country currently under a spell of ‘Hindutva fascism’ (as per NDTV, New York Times, Economist etc), is saying that if only his son’s murderers had slapped him around and complained to him (the father), he would have disciplined his son.
In cases of grooming aka ‘Love Jihad’, it is often seen that the Muslim man assumes a fake Hindu name to build a relationship with the non-Muslim girl, and sometimes even marries the girl in a Hindu temple only to reveal his true identity after marriage. Or initially, the man claims to be respectful of Hindu Dharma and promises to let the girl maintain her Hindu identity even after marriage, only to push for her to convert later when the girl has committed to the relation.
In both cases mentioned above, there was no deceit. There was no pressure on the girl to convert to Hindu Dharma. In the Delhi case, the boy was a role model for his locality, tutoring under-privileged kids while also pursuing his distance education. Yet, he was mercilessly killed for ‘daring’ to talk to a Muslim girl!
And there is a long list of such cases – K Lakshmipathi and Rahul Rajput join the list of others like Ankit Saxena and Khetaram Bheel. If the Hindu man can’t be murdered, then at times the Muslim girl is abducted or killed. Or if not outright murder, Hindu man-Muslim woman couples live in mortal fear of the girl’s family, with police and administration usually turning a blind eye to their pleas for protection.
True to form, some Lutyens’ media outlets like India Today even suppressed the names of K Lakshmipathi’s murderers, all in the name of ‘maintaining communal harmony’ we are sure. But if the identities of the victim and perpetrators had been reversed, Aroon Purie’s hired goons would have been shouting themselves hoarse and demanding BS Yedyurappa’s resignation. Such is the disinterest among our media and elites when a poor Hindu is murdered that we couldn’t even find one photograph of K Lakshmipathi (if any reader comes across a verified photo, please share it with us…the least we Hindus can do is pay respects to our departed and honour their memory)
If the Lutyens’ cabal had a shred of integrity, they would inform public at large of what they surely know – that the Quran and Islamic law (sharia) absolutely prohibit a Muslim woman to marry a non-Muslim man. A Muslim man is allowed to get married to a Christian or a Jew, considered by the Islamic schools as “People of the Book” – however, even a Muslim man cannot marry a polytheist (Hindu) woman until she converts to Islam.
On the contrary, our elites and urban yuppies are busy making and cheering advertisements like the delusional Tanishq ad which shows a Muslim family welcoming a Hindu bride and performing Hindu rites to celebrate her pregnancy!
Did you find this article useful? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.