Elderly Disabled Man Burnt Alive in Aurangabad Riot After Illegal Water Connection to Mosque Snapped

A deadly riot broke out in Shahganj area of Aurangabad on Friday night after an illegal water connection in a mosque was removed by the municipality. A disabled senior citizen Jaganlal Bansile (62) was burnt alive when his house was set on fire by rioters. Police had to resort to use of tear gas and plastic bullets to control the rioting, and one youth Abdul Qadri (17) was killed when a plastic bullet pierced his kidney.

Around 60 people are said to be injured, including around a dozen policemen, while shops and vehicles worth crores was destroyed in the rioting which lasted till the early hours of Saturday morning.

One of the injured policemen, ACP Govardhan Kolekar, is in a critical condition and is being shifted to Mumbai –

Other policemen injured were -ACP (crime) Rameshwar Thorat, City Chowk police inspector Hemant Kadam, Kranti Chowk police inspector Shripad Paropkari and several crime branch personnel.

As per a BBC Marathi report, Suresh Bansile decided to move his family to a safer place as soon as the rioting erupted in front of his house. His disabled father asked Suresh to first ensure the women & children were safe before coming back for him. By the time Suresh came back, his house had been set on fire and 62-year-old Jaganlal Bansile had died a painful death.

Illegal water connection to mosque disconnected

The same BBC report tells us that the Municipal corporation of Aurangabad had had started a campaign to break the unauthorized tap connections in Shahganj area, which falls in the old city area. It is said that the illegal tap connection of a mosque was broken, but the tap connection outside a temple was not, sparking an argument.

However, the Aurangabad administration have denied any partiality in the municipal campaign – “A total of 40 illegal taps were disconnected by the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation. All the connections were in Shahganj area, and the connections were broken irrespective of caste or religion,” said Additional Commissioner of Police Balkrishna Bhal Singh.

For argument’s sake, let us assume that an illegal tap connection outside a mosque was broken while that outside a temple was not – does that in any way justify such deadly rioting? If I am caught doing something illegal, can I argue that why I alone am being targeted? Also, how is it possible to mobilize such a large mob armed with petrol bombs etc at short notice over a minor issue like a water connection?

Hindu mandirs/sacred trees etc are often relocated/destroyed for highway construction, while the administration tiptoes around similar Muslim places of worship – in one case, a mosque in Muzaffarnagar which was obstructing NH 58 could not be moved for 10 years despite causing 80 fatalities. Should Hindu groups go around rioting to protest this ‘partiality’ of the state? In a democratic set up, any aggrieved party can appeal to the district administration or CM or launch a peaceful protest campaign.

The AIMIM link

Aurangabad was an important town in the princely state of Hyderabad ruled by the Nizam, and it continues to be a stronghold of the radical Islamist party AIMIM (All India Majlis-e-Ittehad-ul Muslimeen) which carries forward the Nizam’s legacy. The AIMIM supremo and Islamic hardliner MP Asaduddin Owaisi came up with his own theory for the riots –

Notice how Owaisi completely ignores the ghastly murder of Jaganlal Bansile, and only mentions the Muslim youth killed in police firing.

Now, who is this Racchu PAHELWAN he is talking about? The BBC report tells us that it is actually Lacchu Pehlwan, aka Laxminarayan Bakhodia (Bhakhriya) – a local strongman who is said to own several shops in the area and whose daughter (Yashashri Laxminarayan Bhakhriya) is an independent corporator in the Aurangabad municipal corporation. As per the BBC report, there was recently an argument between Irfan Sheikh, a Muslim mango-trader, and Bakhodia which turned ugly and in which AIMIM corporator Sayyed Sheikh sided with Sheikh.

Hence no surprise that everyone in AIMIM, from MP Owaisi to local MLA Imtiaz Jaleel, is alleging Laxminarayan Bakhodia’s hand in the rioting. Knowing the clout that AIMIM enjoys in Aurangabad, especially in the Muslim-dominated old city area, and their past history of violence, the tactic of blaming someone else is most likely a ploy to deflect investigation of AIMIM’s own role in the rioting.

Aurangabad town has 50% Hindus, 31% Muslim and 15% Buddhist population as per Census 2011. These two tweets sum up the situation on the ground –


Did you find this article useful? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.

  • Bharathi Suta

    It is well known that muslim areas are no-go for government services officials, since most of the connections are illegal, and if any attempt is made to collect dues, violence is resorted to. A father of a friend was a electrical services collecter and they told him plainly that if he enters Bhiwandi (some areas), he will be killed. That’s the stark truth of Muslim areas in India. They are above the law, and answer only to their local goons and mullas.

    • Raj Pati Mishra

      Why to go there . Let the water electricity and all civil amenities are to be stopped to a no go area . Let the law abiding citizens put pressure on each other on the Umara to say that its because of u we are in problem. Let their counsellar do the job.

      We have every style to handle the case and malign our image for no better good. Hindus are 80% in Govt service and police admin, then as to why we are being useless.

      Its money brother , we wanted money for everything and they wanted to be above law by throwing money to us. Let us end this game now, its going to cost us dearly sir.